iNtuitives normally disorganized?

[GOD]

Looking at some statistics the other day and thinking about a perception I have of intuition (Call it intuition about intuition if you will ) it seems that the natural steady state for an intuitive is perceiving. Essentially Intuitives generally should be a variant of

xNxP. (Where the x's could be I/E or T/F).

And by implication, The S function steady natural state is more J. hence

xSxJ.

By this, imagine the notion of divergent in the mind and divergent in the external world. Linear in the mind and systems orientated (bounded systems) as the external preference/manifestation.

Think about crossing these such as xNxJ and xSxP and you can see the high and low (commonly held as) propensity to have a high IQ.

Remember this is all speculative!

So, why is the xNxJ better that the xNxP? Simply because the NJ requires additional effort (determination) to achieve J as they know in order to apply their thoughts they must implement them. The NJ is a doing NP.

On the other hand, we have the SP as relaxed (lazy?) SJ. If you think of the P function rolling up lots of lifestyle choices (rather than just internal orientation) then you can see its implication.

I actually think that N/S are subconscious orientations and the J/P as conscious orientations (manifestation).

[GOD]

As a further continuation to this discussion... take the following stats:

SJ 45%
SP 23%

NJ 12%
NP 21%

~100%

Essentially the NJ's are 50% of the NP's and vice versa the SP's are 50% of the SJ's.

e.g. NJ are the intuitives that do, and the SP's are the doers that don't.

Quite handy when you're assessing the capabilities of workers. (Nice uniform categorization subsets)...

[Louie]

I think some NP's can do, you can train yourself to do almost anything. Truely.

N's disorganised, oh yes, but again, training yourself! The other thing is, even in the apparent "disorganisation" (meaning it appears to some), it maybe clarityworld for the N...total organisation in disorganisation. If that makes sense.

[GOD]

I think some NP's can do, you can train yourself to do almost anything. Truely.

N's disorganised, oh yes, but again, training yourself! The other thing is, even in the apparent "disorganisation" (meaning it appears to some), it maybe clarityworld for the N...total organisation in disorganisation. If that makes sense.

I'm not sure if anyone will cotton onto what I said in the previous posts, but what I am saying is that I believe that the combinations

SJ and NP are steady state environments.

The NJ is very strong because its an Intuitive that implements (Gets closure, and its mind is stronger to rule over the P) and the SP is very weak because of the opposite basis.

[Louie]

BUT....what good is closure if along the path you find another option, another idea, another way...you can always go back and shut the gate if other things don't work (better at least).

Set path and doing....implementing has it's place, but are we not always seeking better?

Robots, surely one day can be trained to implement, look at automated car making factories.