Interestingly I think I've worked out a process that is often thought to be part of "intuition" when in fact it is missing from most intuitives. Rather than intuition it is closer to "invention, insight or innovation", it is based on stored images in the mind.
As an example I'll work through a related set of "intuitive" steps and hypothesise how these happen and how it ties in with some other observations I have made.
Ok, the example is - I
In my last blog post I alluded to the subconscious being controlled by sequences with the conscious brain making executive decisions. Thinking being this conscious activity with the likes of Intuition and Feeling being subconscious.
With sequences and the subconscious this is the basis of evolutionary development. An action creates the necessity for reaction. Animals with lower levels of executive conscious decision making rely to a far greater degree on these routines of the subconscious
Interestingly I was watching a hypnosis experiment the other day and it struck me how interrelated it was with everything else. Blindingly obvious really, effectively switching off the conscious allows the subconscious to control, just as with sleep.
The additional aspect is that the subconscious is capable of what I’d call shadow or Meta memory and can be taught directly or through conscious programming. With Hypnosis it is evident that the conscious barrier is broken down allowing
I absolutely know that I wrote on the net about how Neutrinos would be a likely candidate for travelling faster than light because they could pass through planets and given that they had less resistance which is the biggest inhibitor to interstellar speed. Light like sound is just something that defines the extent of one of our senses and as such it would only be coincidence if indeed it was the fastest possible "thing".
My belief is that Neutrinos could be almost infinitely
The amygdala as an old structure focused on threats (flight / fight) leads to intuition as in an auto suggestive routine that is quicker than rational assessment of the situation.
Now, using the amygdala for other constructive use appears to be a neglected aspect. I believe it is only encountered and used for other constructive use by people with overactive amygdalas and possibly depressive tendencies (which often appear interconnected).
So, why do I say this? Well, because