I read a reasonably interesting article the other day on software being able eventually to read the mind. The most interesting aspect though, is the activation of different parts of the brain based on "thoughts" rather than "experiences". A paragraph as follows. "a person who is thinking of a bear uses the same parts of the brain that light up when he or she thinks of a puppy or something else furry. A person thinking of a bear also ...
I have for quite a while believed that the inability to write precisely (neatly as the teacher would put it) is a function of a more distributive mindset, as in effect it lacks greater ability in precision than a more streamlined sensing orientation. A natural progression of this hypothesis is when we look at the likes of Aspergers and see clumsy co-ordination. It would also follow that distributive mindsets are less likely to good at other precision activities, although we would expect practice ...
Just as divergent thinkers have a slower initial pick up in information (as they bind that into their total knowledge), I would also hazard a guess that actually extracting that information into a written format is equally as difficult. Simply, as one piece of knowledge is attempted to be extracted it follows that everything that is connected to it merits some degree of explanation. Written reports are not mind maps. Yes, we can talk of relevance, but what of different relevance’s ...
Scientists say the higher your I.Q., the more you dream.
Ok, russled up some thoughts on innovative insight and how how thinking intuition and innate connectivity can make the jump into a higher plane of problem resolution.... http://www.psychologytribe.com/forum...intuition.html
Archive
Recent Comments