GOD

I have for quite a while believed that the inability to write precisely (neatly as the teacher would put it) is a function of a more distributive mindset, as in effect it lacks greater ability in precision than a more streamlined sensing orientation. A natural progression of this hypothesis is when we look at the likes of Aspergers and see clumsy co-ordination. It would also follow that distributive mindsets are less likely to good at other precision activities, although we would expect practice to mask most relative innate differences.

The other aspect I readily notice is rapidly changing thought patterns and the speed at which it impacts written dialogue. People talk of being Dyslexic but this is more about simply missing complete words out of paragraphs or noticing that the sentence has veered off on another path midway through. Sure it could be said that its simply a function of not writing quick enough or being a mismatch between thoughts and writing speed but it seems to have the same basis as dyslexia where there is a greater disconnect between the thoughts (brain) and its externalisation (manifestation).

The preceding paragraph also brings me to another point, the one of word recollection. How is it that I could not for the life of me remember the word dyslexia although I knew what it meant and could also visualise the last time and place and person that spoke to me about it. To me, discreet items of information, words, names, places i.e. descriptors are completely separate to visualisations, connections and analogies. To be able to always know lots of situational information that relates to the targeted word "dyslexia" but not actually remember the descriptor (title) has to prove this.

Ok, another point which seems to connect to the proceeding paragraph is one of this "situational memory" or the visualisation alluded to above. Often us guys will say "women can remember what you said, where you said it, and in what context" which isn't seemingly different to the visualisation of the use of "dyslexia" without remembering the descriptor. Sometimes I wonder if I live in a world of "deja-vue" where people tell me the same thing on different occasions without having remembered they have said it before. This is much more prevalent amongst guys than women (The repeating of information to someone without remembering they have said it before, sometimes you have to interject and tell them their complete sentence because hearing it again is annoying).

The interesting question becomes "are guys that are highly intuitive visualists fortunate enough to have had the benefit of both sets of intuition types from their parents?” The reason I say this, is situational visualisation seems far more a female form of intuitive understanding whereas men are more process conceptualisation visualisation. In effect if you have both forms of intuitive bases from your parents then you can use them in combination. (Although it is more than possible that this type of visualisation recollection is similar and just is orientated differently I.e. social conditioning... but I can't quite believe that).